Fracture pattern analysis of fractures to the diaphysis of the fifth metatarsal.

BACKGROUND: Fractures to the fifth's metatarsal (MT-V) diaphysis are common. These are inconsistently referred to as diaphyseal-, shaft-, or Dancer's fractures. A comprehensive analysis of the MT-V fracture morphology is missing. The aim was to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze fracture patterns of MT-V diaphyseal fractures. HYPOTHESIS: Fractures to the shaft of the fifth metatarsal feature specific fracture morphologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, radiologic database study. Included were all acute, isolated MT-V shaft fractures (including the proximal [Lawrence and Botte (L&B) III] and distal meta-diaphysis). Demographics and fracture characteristics were assessed. Each proximal fracture line was drawn, scaled, and a qualitative and quantitative fracture line analysis was conducted. The quantitative fracture line analysis aimed at identifying dens clusters with arbitrary shape using the DBSCAN algorithm. Data are presented as mean±standard deviation. RESULTS: Out of 704 eligible MT-V fractures, 156 met the inclusion criteria. Patient's mean age was 46±19 years and 94% suffered a low energy trauma. Qualitative and quantitative fracture line analysis revealed three distinct fracture patterns. The proximal (30%) and distal (5%) meta-diaphyseal clusters showed a predominant transverse fracture pattern. The vast majority of diaphyseal fractures (56%) were spiral/oblique fractures, progressing from the proximal lateral meta-diaphyseal region in an oblique course at 61±9° to the medial distal diaphyseal cortex. Seven percent of diaphyseal fractures showed a transverse fracture pattern. DISCUSSION: Based on a qualitative and quantitative analysis of all MT-V shaft fractures, three distinct fracture clusters were identified with homogeneous fracture patterns. MT-V shaft fractures should therefore be classified as proximal meta-diaphyseal (L&B Type III), diaphyseal (oblique or transverse) and distal meta-diaphyseal. LEVEL OF PROOF: IV; retrospective database study.

Acute, isolated fractures of the metatarsal bones: an epidemiologic study.

INTRODUCTION: Although metatarsal fractures are common, the significance of previous epidemiologic studies is limited to specific fracture entities, subpopulations, or heterogeneous fracture aetiologies. The aim of the study was to assess the epidemiology of isolated metatarsal fractures in an adult population at a level-1 trauma centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiological and clinical databases were searched for a five-year period. Eligible were all patients with acute isolated metatarsal fractures over the age of 18 years with radiographs in two planes available. Stress fractures, injuries affecting Lisfranc joint stability, and concomitant injuries to other regions than the metatarsals were excluded. Data collection included general demographics, mechanism of injury, season of the trauma and fracture details. RESULTS: Out of 3259 patients, 642 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included for the analysis. The patients' mean age was 44.5 ± 18.9 years, 50.6% were female. 83.3% suffered an isolated, 16.7% multiple metatarsal fractures. Single metatarsal fractures occurred predominantly at the fifth metatarsal bone (81.3%), their frequency decreased with increasing age, with a seasonal peak during the summer. Patients suffering multiple metatarsal fractures were significantly older (51.6 ± 21.2 vs. 43.0 ± 18.1 years; p < 0.001) and the injury resulted significantly more often from a high-energy trauma (6.7% vs. 23.4%; p < 0.001). Multiple metatarsal fractures occurred evenly throughout all metatarsals but revealed a focus on female population with no seasonal differences. CONCLUSION: Single metatarsal fractures predominantly occurred at the fifth metatarsal bone and showed a seasonal, gender and age dependency. Multiple metatarsal fractures were homogeneously distributed between the different metatarsals with distinct age-dependent gender differences. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Calvarial Reconstruction Following Massive Tissue Loss: A Feasible Treatment Strategy and Surgical Technique.

BACKGROUND: Severe cranial injuries require reconstructive surgeries to protect the underlying brain and to restore cranial contour and scalp integrity, as well as avoid complications such as neurocognitive decline. In cases of full-thickness cranial tissue damage, adept surgical skill in both bone and soft tissue reconstruction is critical for a minimally invasive surgery and successful bone integration without endangering previous soft tissue efforts. Different surgical techniques and materials are beset with various problems. OBJECTIVE: To present a surgical procedure intended for the reconstruction of complex calvarial and associated tissue defects with reduced invasiveness and improved soft tissue healing compared to the existing gold standard. Both soft tissue and bone reconstruction techniques are described in detail due to their intertwined importance for successful full thickness skull and scalp reconstruction. METHODS: During initial medical care, aseptic wound treatment and temporary wound closure are performed. Two weeks postinjury, extensive necrotic tissue debridement and soft tissue reconstruction lay the foundation for well-vascularized tissue regeneration. Soft tissue healing is followed by minimally invasive cranioplasty using autologous split-rib transplants after approximately 6 mo. RESULTS: With consideration of the established gold standards for treatment, soft tissue regenerated without complications. The minimally invasive insertion of autologous rib grafts underneath the healed soft tissue allowed for quick recovery without requiring further follow-up treatments. CONCLUSION: We optimized initial scalp wound healing and bone regeneration by making use of minimally invasive procedures and autologous materials, offering a viable treatment alternative to existing methods for treating large cranial bone injuries.